Strong solar activities have long been known to cause damages to electrical grids and global communication systems. However, there exist several evidences that solar activities have strong correlation with abrupt weather conditions and tectonic activities, including storm formations, flash floods, volcanic activities and earthquakes. In this presentation, case studies of such connections are examined and discussed that are linked to electrical properties of the Earth. Simple electrical theories based on laboratory experiments are presented to explain such phenomena.
For more information, please visit www.kpsquare.com/en
source
Strong solar activities have long been known to cause damages to electrical grids and global communication systems. However, there exist several evidences that solar activities have strong correlation with abrupt weather conditions and tectonic activities, including storm formations, flash floods, volcanic activities and earthquakes. In this presentation, case studies of such connections are examined and discussed that are linked to electrical properties of the Earth. Simple electrical theories based on laboratory experiments are presented to explain such phenomena.
excellent
, thank you mate
Hopefully, it is hoped the perspectives of weather forecasters will be positively influenced by you clear sightedness of Universal Cause and Effect. Thank you for your work.
you know the secret of coral castle. I apologise for how bizarre that sounds
Thank you brother…
15:00 nice cloud experiment, cant find it on YT
Its so obvious the Sun would have major effects on our climate. Why is Mainstream scientist so blind. Like my friend Ben would say Eyes Open No Fear.
Living In Florida, Hurricanes cause the most destruction to our habitat. I greatly appreciate the time you've put into your work. I can conclude a better understanding when time comes to get ready for a storm. You may have saved the future life of my love ones and myself.
Everything, literally everything involves electricity, from the electrons around the atoms that form us to the maze of activity in space. How can anyone one possibly discount what Dr. U-Yen is saying? Open minds discover new things. And we certainly do not have to reduce ourselves to rude inappropriate language. You are free to disagree, just try to be a little intelligent about it.
Excellent video and this adds heaps to our understanding of our Electric Universe.
Recognizing ambient space weather and its electrical nature are the Copernican revolution of our time.
Thank you Dr. U-Yen for a fascinating presentation. You are definitely on to something, something much more believeable than HAARP or AGW. Much appreciated!
You might be interested in the connection between rock art and plasma discharge formations. Anthony L. Peratt has been studying rock art from all over the globe and has come to the conclusion that these are plasma discharge formations that are reproducible under laboratory conditions. These were massive formations seen by people all over the globe in the ancient sky. This was such an incredible natural phenomenon that man was compelled to make a record of it all over the world by recording these formations on rocks and cave walls.
Enjoyed listening to your presentations. I have been a long time follower of ancient Egypt (Kemet) and how they revered the Sun. Nothing is done without the Sun. I also like much of what Velikovsky had said,
This ties in well with red sprites & blue jets that I stumbled across a few years back. Very interesting stuff.
I get a sense that the Sun is not really an object made along the lines of a nuclear power plant, but a place of meeting where several highly charged plasma currrents are meeting in one place under certain conditions.
I have noticed that before I see a lightning strike, I see a trace in the sky that the lightning follows right before the electrical discharge. I've also noticed that right before the rain drip begin to fall, there is a crack of lightning. Another thing I noticed while driving along an open stretch of freeway in Texas is how fast clouds build up.
For example, I had just drove thru a very bad storm full of lightning and rain. Eventually I passed thru the storm cloud but to my side and up ahead, there were scattering of small clouds that were just a dull purplish color. They were not big at all and kind of just scattered about. But, I noticed small tentacles of lightning reaching out (from the storm I had just driven thru) and connecting with these small whiffs of purple clouds. These small whiffs of cloud began to get bigger and bigger until I was driving thru rain again. That was pretty awesome and I never will forget that. Those clouds did not form from water evaporation. They grew and eventually produced rain from electrical energy.
we rely on some of the same external electrical forces that the earth does. Food and oxidation just couldn't do it by itself.
I am Paying Attention!!!
Oh no there goes my precious paradigm! Now what shenanigans can be used to justify carbon tax?
People would be wise to look into HAARP when it comes to weather changes.
Thank you for the presentation!
maybe they need to turn the sdo and other satellites around and look at the earth through some of the filters they have or change them accordingly to the amount of flare the earth gives off, ya think?
I wonder if they have used frequency while atom smashing at CERN?
Ben Thank you for the posts about the pulses of the Sun! You are on to something and I will bet my life that with resonance frequency and harmonic frequency that We will eventually create bending of time-space fabric with energy from Sun , Earth and what ever other Space body to Open an Einstein–Rosen bridge
That was an execellent presentation,Doctor U-Yen, Very easy to understand,and I really enjoyed seeing your experiments that back up your data! Im thrilled to have been introduced to your work! (Yes,its all coming together; & love seeing such innovation coming back to life,getting away from the same "repeat"theories science has brought us..makes me excited&brings me hope for our youth too,to bring out there critical thinking again!))
In England we don't have flooding due to charged particles we have flooding through weather modification that has been going on since 1952 when Silver Iodide bombs were exploded in the sky by the RAF, and in America we know through Ted Gunderson FBI, that the CIA Langley Virginia are destroying the worlds Natural Weather, Ted calls them Death Dumpers
Dr. U-Yen, My son who is only 9 loves you and he is doing his Science Fair Project on your work, Ben Davidson of SuspiciousObservers and Thunderbolts. He is planning the "dry ice" experiment for his presentation. I would like to know if you would give him permission to use some your work (with credit to you) as part of his presentation. Thank you for your consideration. He is an "A Honor Roll" student and has also just won at state for his "Living Soil" project.
Very informed hypothesis and physical follow through with evidence… There is no doubt, That 'Duality' is a large part of the vision.. That 'All' is interconnected, is a point that has largely been left out of the loop…However, we are finally beginning to understand the 'reality' of just how deeply we are intertwined with the rest of the universe ( as we currently understand it ) Thanks, and Peace.
Maybe you'll be interested in my observations of the geomagnetic field and plasma discharges within the magnetosphere:
Clash of The Gods – Sudden Storms and Earthquake Factors
Peace!
Very interesting. I think to further prove or disprove this theory it should be possible to calculate the correlation between space weather events and earth weather events. If there is statistical significance between these that proves the cause/effect theory. Statistical analysis of historical events can also more accurately pinpoint where correlation exists, for instance – sunspots correlate more closely to hurricanes whereas CMEs correlate more closely to earthquakes.
I take it English isn't ur first language?? Well u did a gd job, I wish 70% of foreigners who live here could speak it as well as u, cool experiment with the charge in water, it made me water to go electrify the bath tub
Your first incorrect assumption comes in saying energy for an object cannot come form itself (06:00)
An unstable isotope can spontaneously decay and in doing so emits energy (uranium for example). Specif to what you are talking about the earth has vast amounts of energy stored in its molten core which is the origin of of the energy for tectonic plate motions.
You have second problem in asserting the Earth is charged. It cannot remain so. The heliosphere is full of plasma (charged particles, equal numbers of positive [mainly protons] and negative [electrons]). Now image the Earth were charged to whatever potential you want. What would be the effect on that plasma?
Say the Earth were charged to a million coulombs as you say (10:31) or about 6×10^(24) electrons. 6 x 10^(24) protons would rush towards the Earth to neutralize that charge. The surface area of the earth is about 5 x 10^(18) sq cm. If the solar wind were at a density of just 1 proton / cm^3 and flowing at 400 km/s, the time taken to neutralize that charge would be about 0.03 seconds.
So you now have to invent an energy source that keeps recharging the earth to that potential. There is no such source.
The third problem comes in claiming "sunspot expansion" is an abrupt change on the Sun. I am not sure what you mean by sunspot expansion but if you mean growth that would have no affect on earth. Magnetic field strength (like electric fields) are a weak long-distance force, it fall off as the cube of the distance, unlike gravity. We cannot feel the magnetic changes on the Sun at 1AU. That goes for coronal holes and flares. CME's are a different mechanism, they propagate not radiate.
You make a huge leap of faith without any evidence going from various electrical phenomena look like natural phenomena, to showing some electrical activity is associated with phenomena like volcanic eruptions, to believing that electrical phenomena cause the earthquakes or eruptions (23:05). You need to show that the energetics is correct (which it isnt) and that the quantitatively correct (which it is likely not).
Saying something is correlated or "really similar to" or "looks like" or "reminds me of" is not science.
The stuff about sandy is nonsense (25:28). If you check the Kp index for the dates you claim the cme arrived there was nothing going on at those times. The biggest impacts on the magnetosphere were on the 20th, 27th and 30th (as opposed to your claim of the 23rd, 24th and 29th. So there is no correlation between CME imapcts and Hurricane Sandy's wind speeds.
We have dozens of cmes each day and dozens of earthquakes (5 and larger) the chance of them aligning by random within the tolerances you assume is basically 100%.
How many times have we had a 7,0 quake and not cme … check out solar minimum and then let me know your answer. The rate of CME's is 10% of the rate now. So you would expect 10% of the larger quakes. That is not the case.
Maybe you can do a quick case study of tropical cyclona ita showing the correlation of timing of the smaller tremors felt in png up to the opening of the coronal fields and the larger corresponding quake recently
It took the scientific fraternity NASA 6 years to work out that I had discovered magnetic portals and split photonics , being coliders in the Van Allen belt and published on the net here in 2007 http://electrodymagnetic.blogspot.com.au/ which they then republished in 2013, so by the time you wade through these scientific boffins and get them to admit they are wrong with climate change we will all be dead from it
Well done Sir!
Peace and Love to ALL
Good stuff, lots of people already know this, which can help explain the affect humans are currently having on the magnetic grid.
weak. weak. All just a little circumstantial evidence, and no physics involved. The explanation for tornadoes is completely ridiculous. Before you come with a new theory explain why the existing one should be wrong. Then, regarding hurricanes, you should first of all clarify where the energy in hurricanes comes from, and that is pretty well explained using general atmospheric and weather models. Secondly, if you look for correlations between solar events and what's happen on the earth, you have to investigate the weather phenomena on the entire planet, not just claiming connections between local events (one hurricane here or one flooding there) and solar events, which are global for the planet.
I am honored Dr. U-Yen, by your +1 THANK YOU!
thank you very much for the infor.
Thanks from Denmark
All of you here present, are in fact nor just releasing science from its dictators but something more important, WE COMMON PEOPLE WE ARE BEING RELEASED FROM OUR BLINDNESS. . You all are making visible, the invisible. Maria loves you all ladies and gentlemen. Brasília – Brazil
I sure liked this presentation but its not the first of its kind. Different words, more presentable facts that correlate. but not new. Even S0 said it years back. I kept waiting for the new information as I now think a lot of us know/believe this stuff. Other factors to consider as well in space weather are disturbances around our magnetic pond which are much harder to gauge. Like disturbances from.the galactic core affecting our sun. Even a newly formed magnetic connection between our galaxy and another can jolt magnetic lines sending out shock waves. Toss a small rock into the water and a bigger one 2 feet away and see how they react. Picture each ring as the orbit of a planet. The sun has the power, under the right conditions, to blow the atmosphere right off this planet. I think any one who thought space weather had no effect or little on earths weather does not understand the mechanics of a solar system and what living in an inhabitable zone entails. Temperature plays a role when merging fronts meet. There are electromagnetic and radiation flux's manipulating the electronic balances, even harmonics of any planet at any given time. Having a weak magnetopause means more disturbances. Holes in our ozone layer means more penetration. I think we will see wild weather swings
Nothin like a little breakthrough to change yer paradigm. Thunderbolts Project guys need to see this.
Excellent presentation. It really helped me get some fluff out the way.
I guess what we need to know now is how we can dissipate the energy so it does not created unwanted adverse localized phenomena.
If I understood you correctly these phenomena are caused by the interaction of electrical/magnetic fields generated by a minimum of two bodies. In some instances, they are then further aggravated by variables which are currently unidentified as shown via real world data.
I'm guessing that the type of phenomena manifested is based not just on the energies integration or power level themselves, but the frequency at which they resonate. Maybe we need a new system of measurement. I'm willing to bet we have the data, just not the perspective.
The purpose of our ancient global pyramid grid starts to become clearer everyday.
Awesome video. Totally explains thunder storms and how clouds float. I have read others who presented this idea of electric clouds, but your presentation SHOWS it. Thank you for your time. Subscribed, and look forward to more videos!