Lying Cop Gets CAUGHT On Camera CASE DISMISSED

Lying Cop Gets CAUGHT On Camera CASE DISMISSED
Spread The Viralist



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com

Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCqiioLkT4Q

LackLuster’s Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@LackLusterMedia

Sources:

Articles-
https://bit.ly/3sE5Aiu
https://bit.ly/3RuV4EX
https://bit.ly/3qXVFnI
https://bit.ly/464GZSj

Wyo. Stat. § 31-7-116 – https://bit.ly/3R92OMz

Wyo. Stat. § 31-2-204 – https://bit.ly/45CVEEC

Wyo. Stat. § 31-4-103 – https://bit.ly/45EXjd1

Brewer v. Williams- https://bit.ly/45HVL1A

J.D.B v. North Carolina- https://bit.ly/461khun

Wyo. Stat. § 6-5-204- https://bit.ly/3sNoQdG

Garza v. State- https://bit.ly/480AZMx

In re CG- https://bit.ly/44HfUnh
Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-203- https://bit.ly/3Z8FS1L

Wyo. Stat. § 31-5-602- https://bit.ly/3PcEc2Z

Heien v. North Carolina- https://bit.ly/2Yd8trm

Flex Your Rights- https://www.flexyourrights.org/

source

Recommended For You

About the Author: Audit the Audit

38 Comments

  1. The officer may not have seen the passenger situation very clearly, so he may not have been “lying.” It seems this whole time the officer was within his legal rights in the entire scenario. The child was in the wrong.

  2. This police officer walked up to the juvenile with an attitude from the beginning!! This is why people do not like police officers!! officers act like they’re better than everybody and there’s nothing you can do, which is very true, even when you are right

  3. The kid, without a doubt, is a shit head but that officer was wildly out of hand and should not be a cop his inability to control his emotions shows he should not have a badge

  4. First time I’m going to disagree with you guys. I don’t care how bad the cop was that kid is a menace to society and shouldn’t be driving. He should just have mommy drive him instead.

  5. Driver’s just a license-less, stoned 17 year old idiot that was desperate for saving from mommy who can’t even help him!!!😂😂😂 he was wrong n knew he was f**ked!!!😂😂😂 n the mom wants to blame blame blame the cop for following n basically harassing her son. Chick!!! That boy woulda been arrested a long time ago then if the cop was following him over n over in the past for not having a license😂😂😂 so ur WRONG!😂

  6. Same old shittttt different day Fuqin liars, If you want to be a Murderrr, Pedo’ss, Liar, PPP loan, Fraud, Rapistt, Wife beater etc & you can get away be a crooked azz cops It’s only 6 months 😎👍🇺🇸

  7. Perception – how did the other students see how these two officers treated this driver and how this adds to their view of police in general. As for the police department, dirty from the top down and the citizens in the community need to vote out any local officials that are unwilling to fire most of the police personnel

  8. I get that the kid should give up his license. But in what other situation or profession is it alright to be such a dick about things. Does the officer go about talking to everyone like that , like his family & friends or just when he is in uniform?

  9. Great channel, great content, however…. I would love it if you would change from saying constitutional rights to constitutionally protected rights…. We are born free… not granted freedom by a constitution..

  10. The dash cam on the cops car proves there was no one in the crosswalk. So, there was no reason for the stop to begin with. Therefore none of the other charges matter. I don't agree with your assessment at all.

  11. "Reasonable suspicious arises from a combination of the facts and the officers understanding of the law" he can be reasonable wrong in both and you are still fucked.

  12. If a cop was a real man, he would have been kind to the kid and let him go with just warning or advice on driving etiquette. Instead the cop is not a real man. He's Fkn Nazi tyrant who should be fired for how we treated a member of the public. What Jack-ass!

  13. How does the officer gets an F??! Obviously, the kid’s mom is clearly doing a terrible job raining that brat, and the community has to before he becomes a bigger problem for the community. The officer gets a
    B+, the kid gets an F, and the mom gets FFFFFFFF

  14. Why is the cop shouting? He sounds terrified, this cop is an embarrassment to manhood.
    The child is at fault also, when I was sixteen I always had my license with me and registration and insurance numbers were in the glove box.
    This was just silly, both parties accelerated this whole encounter beyond all reason.
    Officer Stinson sounds like a Nervous Nelly and a massive lawsuit waiting to happen.

  15. First things, first, Officer Stinson, as well as the other two officers violated fourth first fifth and third amendment rights in my opinion this officer should lose qualified immunity, as well as both other officers that illegally detained as well as illegally searched this child’s car for no in fraction other than his pompous attitude as a police officer, who believes he’s above the law in this case in my opinion, the officer should be sentenced to no less than 10 years in prison and have to pay a minimum of $500,000 of his own money and the city, allowing this officer to use his authority in this manner should be charged for all four of the amendment violations that word, adhere to hear which would result in a lawsuit in the amount of no less than $2.9 million allocated towards the child

  16. They're not cops, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo committing another act of brutality against a teenager. They're sadistic, savage, bloodthirsty, barbarians, and ravenous hyenas.

Comments are closed.